They have us surrounded.

The structural failures giving rise to our claims are not exactly new discoveries. We may be pioneering by the scale of our lawsuit, but we really have nothing unique to add to the overwhelmingly defined problem. This has been done before. Well paid lawyers have given well made arguments, and high level courts have made high level rulings on them. It's plain to see that the long train of lawsuits, for better or worse, have led to where we are now, still pleading for relief from essentially the same systemic failures. We're surrounded by a culture of corruption built alongside historical failures to turn the tide. This might be altogether discouraging to some, but it shouldn't be. We live in the information age, so every past pleading and every past finding is free expert legal advice. Webster has written the dictionary so to speak, so we don't have to rewrite it to convince others by our own merits of the truths it establishes. It really simplifies everything. Of course, the metaphorical dictionary that defines the problems and failed remedies in family law, while written, has not been well compiled. We only need to put the pieces of the puzzle together to show the big picture to both the courts and the people. So, for those of you who want to help, but are unsure of how to do so, it’s simple: Google is free. We need as many links to as many news articles or other info on as many past relevant lawsuits we can find. Set this page as a bookmark, and post links as a comment whenever you come across a useful past case to include.